14 Feb 2020

Tax and the City Review for February 2020

Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews look at the government’s post-Brexit ambitions for the financial services sector and at HMRC’s further guidance on the hybrid capital instruments rules and their statistics on DPT receipts. They also consider the UT decision in Hicks and progress on the two pillars of international tax reform.

It is ‘business as usual’ following exit day according to the EU Withdrawal Agreement (at least for matters covered by the agreement) and the government sets out its post-Brexit ambitions and priorities for the financial services sector. HMRC publishes further guidance on the interpretation of the hybrid capital instruments rules. The Upper Tribunal in Hicks finds that the taxpayer’s accountant was careless in completion of his tax returns and that the conditions for HMRC to raise a discovery assessment are met. Progress is made on the two pillars of international tax reform, with the agreed outline on Pillar One noting that there is a compelling case for retail banks and insurance to be outside the scope of the new taxing right. The latest HMRC statistics show, unsurprisingly, diverted profits tax receipts are down on last year but they also reveal that HMRC has concluded a number of older transfer pricing cases.

This article was first published in the 14 February 2020 edition of Tax Journal.

 

 

This material is provided for general information only. It does not constitute legal or other professional advice.

Practices Tax, Tax Disputes
Contact Information
Mike Lane
Partner at Slaughter and May
Zoe Andrews
PSL Counsel & Head of Tax Knowledge at Slaughter and May